The fresh new prominent story away from relationship ‘refuse,’ hence assumes a past wonderful age wedding, is basically wrong” (pp
Review by the

Michael L. Satlow , Jewish marriage Hrvatska Еѕene za marku in the antiquity. Princeton: Princeton College Drive, 2001. xii, 431 users ; 25 cm. ISBN 069100255X $.

Tawny Holm , Indiana College away from Pennsylvania.

That it illuminating and complete publication from the Satlow happens much to exhibit you to discussion on the subject of ong Jews, and you may amongst their Christian, Roman, and Greek locals, as it is now during the progressive American and progressive Jewish area. Satlow, whom notices matrimony due to the fact a socially built, culturally created organization, provides an excellent refreshingly historical position towards the alarmist commentary nowadays. “The fact your commentary out of public marital ‘crisis’ is indeed old at least would be to aware me to the fresh new options we try referring to a question of rhetoric way more than just facts. xvi-xvii). As for the comparing upbeat belief one to modern matrimony is rather an improvement for the crappy past of one’s patriarchal past, Satlow means that old Judaism is much more tricky than of many guess, and contains “one or more rabbinic articulation off relationship beliefs . . . to help you opponent our own egalitarian impression” (p. xvii).

If the “one rabbinic articulation” off near-egalitarianism impresses most of the reader, Satlow’s case for higher variety involving the additional Jewish communities are well-produced (the Palestinian rabbis continuously come in a better light compared to Babylonian), with his publication have a tendency to ergo feel tempting not only to students out of Near East antiquity and you may Judaism, but toward learned personal. […]